Submitted by hajkar on September 28, 2009 - 2:10pm.
This is a list provided by the EPA of sites deemed by the Department of Homeland Security of coal ash sites deemed as "high risk". Can you provide the criteria by which this determination is made?
Submitted by walteraw on September 28, 2009 - 2:26pm.
Go to the EPA web site to start. There are dozens of articles. Coal ash among other things can contain large quantities of heavy metals which can cause cancer and neurological problem.
Submitted by hajkar on September 29, 2009 - 6:19am.
I asked if you could provide some criteria by which the EPA deemed these sights as "high risk". Instead of an answer you tell me to go look it up myself. Thanks for nothing.
I found this explanation through a search. Such a statement would have provided the much needed perspective your original blog entry is sorely lacking.
"The hazard rating pertains not to the integrity of the storage units but rather to what might be threatened if a unit were to fail. EPA defines “high-hazard potential rating” to mean “that a failure will probably cause loss of human life.”"
Walter Winch will blog here regularly on the environment and hopes you’ll join in the discussion. Walter’s opinions are his own and don’t necessarily reflect views of The Kansas City Star.
And what does this mean?
This is a list provided by the EPA of sites deemed by the Department of Homeland Security of coal ash sites deemed as "high risk". Can you provide the criteria by which this determination is made?
"and"
Go to the EPA web site to start. There are dozens of articles. Coal ash among other things can contain large quantities of heavy metals which can cause cancer and neurological problem.
The answer is no?
I asked if you could provide some criteria by which the EPA deemed these sights as "high risk". Instead of an answer you tell me to go look it up myself. Thanks for nothing.
I found this explanation through a search. Such a statement would have provided the much needed perspective your original blog entry is sorely lacking.
"The hazard rating pertains not to the integrity of the storage units but rather to what might be threatened if a unit were to fail. EPA defines “high-hazard potential rating” to mean “that a failure will probably cause loss of human life.”"